Yes, it’s only ten days since I mentioned that WordPress 2.0.6 was available, but a combination of the FeedBurner issue and a nasty security problem that could be a major problem for WordPress installations on some servers has led to the rather rapid release of WordPress 2.0.7.
This is a security update, and all WordPress users are advised to upgrade. If you’re already on 2.0.6[1], you just need to replace six files, which are listed on the Development Blog. If you’re on an earlier version, you might want to look at Bryan Layman’s nifty upgrade script. I used a slightly earlier version to get to 2.0.6, and a much earlier version for 2.0.5, and it worked nicely for me.
However you upgrade, make sure you do.
Version 2.1 is scheduled for release this time next week. But if you’re not ready for the major changes that will bring, don’t worry – the developers will continue to maintain 2.0.x for a long time to come.
[1] And if not, you should be!
Well, after some time
, I think I’ve figured out the answer. It is
1,3,10,20,11,2,12,15,16,22,18,7,6,9,13,4,19,5,8,14, 21,17
Is that the correct answer?
Oh! I should say that I am referring to your sounds page and the correct ordering of the conversation… There was no place to leave a comment, but that was a puzzle wasn’t it? When I load them all up in MusicMatch, in the correct order, I get this conversation…
Les #1: 1 Mutter
Les #2: 3 Ahem
Les #1: 10 Life? Don’t talk to me about life
Les #2: 20 I seeeeeeeeeeee…
Les #1: 11 So, it’s pick on Les day, I see
Les #2: 2 Yes
Les #1: 12 I am completely innocent
Les #2: 15 Uh huh
Les #1: 16 What?
Les #2: 22 Not really
Les #1: 19 I blame AJ
Les #2: 7 So, no change there, then
Les #1: 6 He’s never denied it
Les #2: 9 Naah, it’s your end, not mine
Les #1: 13 Hah!
Les #2: 4 Pedant
Les #1: 19 Bastards!
Les #2: 5 Tart
Les #1: 8 Boing!
Les #2: 14 Hey!
Les #1: 21 Woo hoo hoo hoo!
Les #2: 17 Context Alert!
Makes sense to me… OK, I’m up wayyyy to late….
Brian Layman Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 5:21. Reply to Brian LaymanYou have to play them backwards while balancing a sea lion on your nose[1] to get the full impact of the hidden message
[1] A phrase that popped into my head recently. I think it likes it there, as it’s apparently quite a strange place
Les Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 7:32. Reply to Lesjust a little update on my websites success, I have had 20hits today.
David Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:00. Reply to DavidWOOO HOOOO
Ummm, 165 so far today, but I think that’s in California time, so it may just be since 8am. 340 yesterday.
Les Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:17. Reply to Lesah ha, but you’ve missed the point my friend……..
20 today, thats on MY WEBSITE, only me and you look at that normally lol
David Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:18. Reply to Davidbtw, any tips on how to get it noticed more?
David Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:21. Reply to DavidYeah, I think Aaron had a look, too
Les Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:21. Reply to LesPost more. You’ll get picked up by Google if you have more content.
Les Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 21:22. Reply to Lesdo you think i should read anything into the fact (according to my stat thingy) someone in america has been on my website for 12 hours straight?
David Tuesday, 16th January 2007 at 23:49. Reply to DavidOnly if they’re the FBI.
Les Wednesday, 17th January 2007 at 7:51. Reply to Lestried getting you on msn but it wouldnt have it.
David Wednesday, 17th January 2007 at 22:19. Reply to DavidThat dream host thing is working now… but are “requests” hits?
That depends on what you think a “hit” is.
A “hit” or indeed a “request” is a connection for an item – that could be the main page, or an image, or a script file, or an embedded video, or…..
Les Thursday, 18th January 2007 at 0:08. Reply to Lesso if I said I had 3000+ requests this week so far, is that good?
David Thursday, 18th January 2007 at 0:34. Reply to DavidNot as good as you might think. That includes you working on the site (each smilie is a request, on each page that it loads) and it includes Google wandering over your site.
Les Thursday, 18th January 2007 at 7:54. Reply to Lesawww
why cant it just be simple and say x many peoplehave been on
David Thursday, 18th January 2007 at 20:23. Reply to DavidIt does, sort of. You just have to read it more carefully.
Les Thursday, 18th January 2007 at 22:38. Reply to Les